Economic
changes of packers and movers pune
Impelled
by the same curiosity concerning spatial- economic changes and the same wonder
about the results of regional policies - which in the post- war period revived
throughout Europe- economic geographers and regional economists in many
countries started to investigate the phenomenon of firm relocation. This was
undoubtedly stimulated ny the publications of their UK and US colleagues packers and movers pune and movers and packers pune.
In
hindsight this period of the nineteen seventies may be considered as the
florescence of classical firm migration research. Aydalot published results of
firm migration research in France Aydalot 1972, 1978, Camagni and others i.e.
Ortona and Santagata did the same for Italy Ortona and Santagata , 1980, Ortona
et al, 1981- naturally with a heavy accent on the Italian Mezzogiorno, the main
target area for Italian regional policy Camagni 1976. Christiansen 1978, 1979
published results in Denmark.
The
Netherlands had a rather early but very complete industrial migration report by
SISWO 1967 followed by a survey study by Pellenbarg 1976, 1977. Some
information regarding Ireland. Belgium and Greece became also available.
Klaassen and Molle deserve our appreciation for opening the content of all
these original but not very accessible studies to the international scientific
audience with their book on Industrial mobility and migration in the European
Community Klaassen and Molle 1983.
Through
this book for the first time a European survey of information concerning firm
relocation became available which permitted to draw some general conclusions.
A
European survey
Klaassen
en Molle’s book presents information on firm migration in all EU member
countries with the exception of Luxemburg. Each country is treated in a different
chapter, and in the authors of the various chapters we recognize many of the
researchers mentioned in the previous section, i.e. Town roe the UK, Bade for
Germany, Aydalot for France Camagni for Italy etceteras.
We
also recognize the complaints of these authors about the absence of firm
migration registration systems which are indeed repeated for most countries. A
more interesting outcome of the European comparison is that in all countries
the same bi- partition of firm migration is observable viz.
the
industrial sub- urbanization around the larger urban agglomerations on the one
hand short distance moves mostly transfer moves and on the other hand the
industrial decentralization long distance moves more often concerning the
establishment of branch plants from the economic core areas to peripheral and /
or development areas. Only Greece stands out as an exception because it still
shows a reverse movement.
No comments:
Post a Comment